By al-Din on April 23, 2010 2:52 AM
Reading between the lines ...
Tun's no. 1 and no. 6 (last) statements are repetitious on purpose (I guess) as if to seek confirmation of the truthfulness, an element of doubt perhaps. Each statement is not only longish but disjointed having two opposing or yes-and-no sub-statements.
Moreover, each need to be read in one breath (go)and at least a couple of times in order to ascertain what it's trying to say. There is a subtle message in the blurry blurbs. That is how I interpret it.
Well, Tun knows better with nuances of languages both written and oral.
Whatever it is, there is a case of flip-flop here of which the newspaper reports seem to bear more of the brunt. PM don't lie (!). But, could there be misreporting on such an important and sensitive international and national issue?
The collateral damage is yet to be seen very soon in the P94 by-election.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment